data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ceb64/ceb64915316c73e00f5fdf180d6135677b732085" alt=""
In the
VtES Usenet Newsgroup LSJ has suggested the a change (after a lengthy discussion of the contest rules) for the
transfers rule, which says that the transfer rules shouldn't be unnecessarily restricted to uncontrolled minions. The rules change proposal looks like this:
- Spend 1 transfer to move a counter from your pool either to a vampire you control or a card in your uncontrolled region to your pool.
- Spend 2 transfers to move a blood from either a vampire you control or a card in your uncontrolled region to your pool.
On the left (side bar) you can vote in a poll whether you like this proposal or not.
2 comments:
I asked this same question in the GoogleGroups, but no one replyed and i don't seem to understand why can you choose between 1 transfer and 2 transfers to move one blood from a card on your uncontrolled region to your pool.
Original text:
"Spend 1 transfer to move a counter from your pool either to a vampire you control or a card in your uncontrolled region to your pool."
-> isn't this part of the text wrong? the last part is the same as the one below and only «costs» 1 transfer! Shouldn't the last part be deleted? "(...)to your pool."
"Spend 2 transfers to move a blood from either a vampire you control or a card in your uncontrolled region to your pool."
-> so normal transfers apply, with added funcionality to work as a 'blood doll' at the cost of two transfers.
Ricardo Marta
Prince of Lisboa
I hate this new suggestions. If this should become the new rule. I guess I would play restricted vitae in every deck.
Make more cards that does what LSJ want.
LSJ's thoughts
Gehenna Event
* Spend 1 transfer to move a counter from your pool either to a vampire you control or a card in your uncontrolled region to your pool.
* Spend 2 transfers to move a blood from either a vampire you control or a card in your uncontrolled region to your pool.
Post a Comment